The U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) has released a sweeping 376-page proposed rulemaking to implement the GENIUS Act — the landmark stablecoin legislation signed into law by President Trump on July 18, 2025 — and the implications for the crypto industry are profound. At the heart of the proposal is a hard prohibition on yield or interest payments tied to holding payment stablecoins. Comptroller Jonathan Gould framed the initiative as building a system where "stablecoins can flourish in a safe and sound manner," but critics argue the framework amounts to a regulatory moat designed to benefit traditional banks at the expense of retail crypto users. The OCC has opened a 60-day public comment window on the proposal, signaling that while the framework is advanced, the final rule is not yet set in stone.

The stablecoin yield ban was already embedded in the statutory text of the GENIUS Act, which prohibits permitted payment stablecoin issuers from paying any form of interest or yield to token holders. The OCC's proposal goes further, however, by introducing what is described as a "rebuttable presumption" — a regulatory mechanism that presumes an issuer is violating the yield ban if it pays yield to an affiliate or related third party that then passes those returns along to stablecoin holders. This anti-evasion framework is designed to close loopholes that the banking sector has argued could allow crypto exchanges and platforms to effectively circumvent the ban by routing yield payments through intermediaries. While two narrow exceptions exist — merchant discount programs and non-affiliate white-label profit sharing arrangements — these carve-outs are tightly drawn and do not create meaningful yield opportunities for retail holders.

The timing of the OCC's move is no coincidence. The White House set a March 1st deadline for banks and the crypto industry to reconcile their differences over stablecoin yield provisions ahead of Senate deliberations on the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025, commonly referred to as the CLARITY Act. Senate Democrats were scheduled to meet on February 27th at 2:30 PM to discuss the crypto market structure bill. Prediction markets tracked on platforms like Polymarket reflected growing confidence in the CLARITY Act's passage, with odds reportedly climbing past 70% in recent sessions — a rise directly attributed to the White House aligning with banking interests on the yield question. By resolving the yield debate through OCC rulemaking, regulators may have effectively cleared one of the CLARITY Act's most contentious hurdles before it even reaches a Senate floor vote.

**Get 6% back in XRP with the Uphold Debit Card.**

The big winners in this regulatory framework are traditional banks and established payment networks. Without the ability to earn yield on stablecoins, consumers have little financial incentive to park funds in digital dollar instruments rather than interest-bearing bank deposits, reinforcing existing deposit relationships. Major card networks, particularly Visa and its Visa Direct infrastructure, are also positioned to benefit as stablecoins become purely transactional rather than yield-generating instruments. On the other side of the ledger, companies like Coinbase face a mixed outcome. While regulatory clarity around the CLARITY Act could unlock significant institutional onboarding and trading revenue, the prohibition on stablecoin yield programs directly threatens a meaningful revenue line that the exchange has relied on to attract and retain retail users. It is worth noting that the GENIUS Act is not expected to fully take effect until January 2027, leaving approximately 18 months of transition time for the industry to adapt.

The broader regulatory tightening extends beyond yield restrictions. Commentary around the CLARITY Act has raised concerns about additional consumer-facing constraints, including potential provisions that would subject Bitcoin ATMs to Bank Secrecy Act requirements, mandate Know Your Customer (KYC) identity verification for ATM users, cap transaction activity, and impose a 72-hour holding period before customers could transfer purchased assets. If enacted, these measures would significantly erode one of the last accessible on-ramps for unbanked and underbanked individuals to enter the crypto ecosystem — a constituency that has drawn the attention of entrepreneurs like YouTuber MrBeast (Jimmy Donaldson), whose Beast Industries initiative is reportedly exploring blockchain-based financial tools as a means to democratize access to financial services globally. The MetaMask-Mastercard payment card partnership, which launched in the U.S. with on-chain rewards tied to KYC verification, reflects a parallel trend in which crypto tools are increasingly integrated with — and conditioned upon — traditional identity and compliance infrastructure.

The crypto industry now finds itself at a crossroads between legitimacy and liberty. The regulatory framework taking shape in Washington undeniably advances consumer protections and systemic stability, and the GENIUS Act's passage was widely celebrated as a landmark moment for digital asset policy. Yet the cumulative effect of the yield ban, the anti-evasion framework, expanded KYC requirements, and potential CLARITY Act provisions is to progressively channel the crypto economy into structures that closely mirror the traditional financial system the technology was originally designed to circumvent. Whether these developments represent a maturation of the industry or a capture of it by banking incumbents will likely depend on how the 60-day comment period unfolds, how Congress handles the yield question in the CLARITY Act, and whether the industry can mount an effective case that competitive yield products serve the public interest rather than undermine it.

Stablecoin Yields BANNED Before CLARITY Act!!?

Chaos Returns! CLARITY Collapses! Crypto Market Update