The GENIUS Act's passage in 2025 was supposed to be a stepping stone toward broader digital asset legislation, but according to Congressman Warren Davidson, it may have had the opposite effect. Speaking in a recent interview, Davidson argued that passing the stablecoin bill as a standalone measure released the pressure that had been building in Congress to pass comprehensive crypto legislation. With the Clarity Act now struggling to gain momentum heading into 2026, Davidson's earlier warnings appear to have been validated. He had urged lawmakers to hold the full package together, believing that a unified bill covering both stablecoins and digital asset market structure would have had a better chance of becoming law under the favorable political climate that President Trump's election created.

The Clarity Act, which seeks to establish clear regulatory classifications for digital assets — determining whether a given asset is a security, commodity, or real-world asset — remains stalled largely due to the contentious debate over stablecoin yields. The banking industry, led in part by the American Bankers Association, has lobbied aggressively against allowing stablecoin issuers to pay interest to holders, viewing it as a direct competitive threat to traditional deposit accounts. Fintech advocates and crypto proponents argue the opposite, contending that prohibiting yield on stablecoins effectively denies ordinary Americans access to competitive returns on their savings. Davidson himself expressed support for allowing stablecoin yields, framing the battle as fundamentally one between the legacy banking industry and an emerging financial technology sector seeking a level playing field.

Self-custody emerged as another of Davidson's core concerns with the current legislative landscape. He voted against the GENIUS Act in part because it failed to adequately protect individuals' rights to hold their own digital assets outside of account-based systems. Davidson argued that without self-custody protections, the entire premise of decentralized finance collapses, since DeFi cannot function meaningfully if all assets must remain in custodied accounts. He drew a sharp distinction between stablecoins used for payments — where self-custody is essential — and tokenized securities, where existing regulatory frameworks already limit custody options through broker-dealers and accredited investor rules. For Davidson, any version of the Clarity Act that protects self-custody and DeFi, even if it falls short on stablecoin yields, would represent an acceptable if imperfect outcome.

**Tangem -** Use Code: "**PBN**" for Additional Discounts! ➜ https://bit.ly/TangemPBN

Beyond crypto legislation, Davidson discussed a separate but related legislative effort: reforming Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which was approaching a reauthorization deadline of April 20, 2026. Section 702 authorizes the surveillance of named foreign individuals, but inevitably sweeps up communications involving American citizens through what is known as incidental collection. Davidson, who co-sponsored reform legislation alongside Senator Elizabeth Warren in a rare bipartisan pairing, argued that when collected data is used for domestic law enforcement rather than foreign intelligence purposes, federal agencies should be required to obtain a warrant. He also raised concerns about agencies circumventing Fourth Amendment protections entirely by purchasing data from private data brokers, a practice he warned will become even more invasive as artificial intelligence enables companies to lease rather than buy data sets.

Davidson connected his privacy concerns directly to the crypto space, noting that opposition to surveillance programs and support for cryptocurrency tend to travel together ideologically. He warned that a retail central bank digital currency, while requiring congressional authorization according to Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, could effectively be replicated through a wholesale CBDC framework that links many private stablecoin issuers back to a central authority — what he colorfully described as a "Hydra" structure. He expressed concern that the GENIUS Act failed to adequately address this risk, and that as the stablecoin market matures, a dominant centralized player could emerge that functions practically like a government-controlled digital currency regardless of its nominal private status. This, he argued, makes robust protections for self-custody and decentralized infrastructure not just financially important, but essential to civil liberties.

Looking ahead, Davidson remained cautiously optimistic but realistic about the Clarity Act's prospects. He suggested the most likely path to passage involves Senate deal-making happening largely behind closed doors, followed by a rapid push to force the bill across the finish line before opposition factions have time to mobilize — a pattern consistent with how the GENIUS Act itself was passed. He noted that Senator Tim Scott, as chair of the Senate Banking Committee, needs to feel renewed pressure from the crypto industry to reignite momentum. Davidson indicated that the House would likely vote on whatever version the Senate produces, potentially subject to amendment. Whether that version will satisfy the industry on key issues like stablecoin yields and self-custody protections remains uncertain, but Davidson made clear that for him, a bright-line test for asset classification combined with strong self-custody rights represent the non-negotiable core of any deal worth supporting.

CLARITY & Privacy Final Battle? Rep. Warren Davidson INTERVIEW

CLARITY Leak Collapses Stablecoin Yield Companies